![]() It’s thought that “publicly-oriented scientific disagreement… undermines trust in science emphasizing the uncertainty will mean anything goes, that scientists don’t know anything” - "And I wanted to push back against that," says Zeynep Pamuk (UC San Diego).Examining utterances that are “always speaking”–most laws, for instance–can help us distinguish different meanings of “meaning” - the Legal-Phi interview blog, run by Lucas Miotto (Maastricht), returns with a conversation with Martin David Kelly (Edinburgh).“Even when they deemed it a fable, there was some degree of uncertainty concerning its existence… making it a heuristic tool to understand the nature of plants” - on the scientific & philosophical value of a mythical lamblike animal-plant (via The Browser). ![]() “The empirical investigation of a topic like happiness is only going to be as good as the initial conceptualization that frames the hypothesis guiding the inquiry” - an interview with philosopher Bernard Reginster & psychologist Joachim Krueger (Brown), who team teach a course on happiness.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |